theedge00 Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 The recent death of MCA got me thinking.... what if Mark, Tom or Travis would die, would you want Blink to continue with someone else or just end Blink. Quote
Tyler☮ Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 end blink. everybody that's currently in blink IS blink. without one of them, it wouldn't be blink anymore. Quote
Scott. Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 If Mark or Tom die, Blink ends. Travis then I'd want it to continue with someone else. Harsh maybe, but that's what I think. Quote
Pussay Patrol Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 ^ Man it would almost be the weirdest for me if they continued without Travis, would not like that at all. As far as recorded stuff it'd sound so different and shitty. Quote
Scott. Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 I've never like him to be honest, he's a great drummer and brings a lot to Blink, but it's always been Mark and Tom for me and Travis is just in the background. Quote
Pussay Patrol Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 But...but...the new drummer might wear a shirt or something Quote
Scott. Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 Good, maybe he won't have drawings all over his fucking head too Quote
Aria Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 I think it would be different for both Mark and Tom. If Mark died Tom would have a way out of blink, and would end it right away (For both the right and wrong reasons). If Tom died I could see Mark putting out a statement saying he doesn't know what will happen with blink, and then putting out a blink record a year or so later. Travis dying would be hard for them but Mark would push for them to continue and Tom would do it cause he's a bit of a confrontation pussy it seems. Quote
unicornslut Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 If Tom or Travis died I would want Mark to continue, but if Mark dies blink is over. Quote
darkarrow Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 I think if Travis dies it's over. There wouldn't be much of a reason for Mark and Tom to work together anymore. Travis almost dying is what brought them together again, but there still is obviously too many differences between Mark and Tom. If Tom dies Blink probably shouldn't continue either. If Mark dies then there is NO reason for Blink to continue. Really I guess if any of them die then the band should be over. Quote
darkarrow Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 Although if any of them could die and it keep going it would have to be Travis I suppose considering he isn't a founding member. Still don't think it would happen though. Quote
thongrider Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 If Scott would still be into it I'm sure they'd reform at some point if such a terrible thing would happen, I don't think it would be possible any other way though, as it would be more +44/boxcar than blink. Quote
fate-fell-short Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 Scott rejoining is less likely then them becoming a two person band with mark on drums and tom on sitar. For me Tom and Mark are blink and Travis is obviously a big part but not as big as those two. Quote
bojangles Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 i was thinking about this earlier today for some reason to... if Mark or Tom die blink is over. that's it. Travis were to die... i'd say bring Scott back. Quote
Ghent Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 there is no blink without one of them This. Although they could continue pretty easily without Tom or Travis. They would just be like Lynyrd Skynyrd or Queen. They could exist as a tribute to the original or whatever. Quote
WIGGUM Posted May 9, 2012 Posted May 9, 2012 if travis died i'd say bring in ilan rubin on drums. he has a similar style to travis, travis used to teach him and he's already working with tom. but yeah if mark or tom died i'd say end it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.