Meltdown Tracker Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 So it comes down to wanting to maintain being exclusive and obscure? Lol gay 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 if they should be pissed at anyone, they should be pissed at Mark. he knows fully well people would spread it, and thats whats shed the light on the group. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghent Posted August 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 this. and if it's the position of the mods of that page, as it is private and belongs to them, it's certainly their right. Yeah, except that collector's group is subject to mod approval only. So it doesn't matter how many people know about it, they can have as many members as they want. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 regardless of that - Despite Matt not singing in it, and it probably being written by Dan, I would love for a song on the new album to be in a similar style / energy as this, with Matt and Mark trading vocals. could be very cool. >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ga0-r07hkiA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveyjones Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 So it comes down to wanting to maintain being exclusive and obscure? Lol gay i'm not sure obscurity equates with homosexuality anymore. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveyjones Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 if they should be pissed at anyone, they should be pissed at Mark. he knows fully well people would spread it, and thats whats shed the light on the group. this is an interesting notion. could mark have intended it that way? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 this is an interesting notion. could mark have intended it that way? Lol of course not but it's just as ridiculous to get mad at him as it is at their own members. ultimately he knows the power his words would have and so do the admins. it's the risk you take having him involved like that. he added no addendum to keep it private from his end, so really there's no massive issue. if Mark had posted the same thing on twitter or FB himself the group would have been fine, but he chose to share it that way and of course the outcome would be it leaking. I'm saying if they're petty enough to get pissed about it, they should be pissed at Mark too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheerios4u98 Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 I'm sure Mark knew the news would spread like wildfire. Even tweets/posts they delete still somehow get screenshotted first and then passed around the net. This happened a lot with Tom when it was announced that he was out of the band. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghent Posted August 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 i'm not sure obscurity equates with homosexuality anymore. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Low Value Boy Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 New rock oriented guitarist= more "blink" than yodeling weird space TomIt could be better for sure but blink is Mark and Tom for me as I've said many times.Just my opinion of course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveyjones Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 is that the guy from the hangover? i have gifs disabled (first thing i did after joining this site). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Meltdown Tracker Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 It could be better for sure but blink is Mark and Tom for me as I've said many times.Just my opinion of course. They'll probably brand themselves as "Blink 182 with Matt Skiba" or something, like Sublime with Rome, for legal reasons and then it's not the same as Blink so everyone is happy. They should just be Blink Skiba2, hell that name makes more sense than 182 does as the members are Skiba + 2 others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghent Posted August 18, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 I kind of think they'll just continue as blink-182 and Tom will get his royalties for past shit and a nice buyout of some sort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chewy030 Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 I kind of think they'll just continue as blink-182 and Tom will get his royalties for past shit and a nice buyout of some sort. Yeah if they're going to continue playing Blink-182 songs and having Matt sing Tom's parts no reason to not continue with the name Blink-182, i hope they don't go the stone temple pilots route and have to say "Blink-182 w Matt Skiba" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSandt Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 -They should continue as blink 182. -Tom should be given absolutely nothing, aside from royalties for past stuff. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 -They should continue as blink 182.-Tom should be given absolutely nothing, aside from royalties for past stuff. He was a founding member, it makes sense for a buy out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MSandt Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 He quit the band. He just wasn't explicit about it, but it's like not showing up for work for months and then getting "fired". 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radioactive tomdog Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 they're obviously continuing as blink-182. that's been made pretty clear. why else would they need to legally separate from tom if they were changing the name 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blink182acti0n Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 Tom probably is getting 50% from this for doing nothing .>http://youtu.be/Tt8DoNerIPY 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Champ182 Posted August 18, 2015 Report Share Posted August 18, 2015 What do you guys want/expect Blink 2.0 to sound like? I think the vibe will lighten up compared to the darker vibe they've been in for the last decade. Less experimentation and a more focused straight forward rock record. Maybe a similar vibe to the latest Desaparecidos album actually. What do you guys think? >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZW8u__GvEwk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.