Blink182life-4life Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 1 hour ago, Zoltan said: i can't believe people think those numbers are representing the real songwriting percents. it's obviously just a legal thing. feldmann's help was probably 1-2% on each song, but he got 20% credit. matt was probably almost equal as mark and travis (so it should have been 25-30%), but he's the new guy, maybe just a temporary member, so he got about 15%. people should learn that money overwrites facts. I wasn't quoting the numbers as fact. That is however how they are allowing it to be represented legally. And in that representation mark has the lowest percent of credit. Is that mark being modest and not giving a fuck? Possibly. It clearly meant something to feldman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoltan Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 1 hour ago, NotNow said: Don't understand 1-2%. If he was only writing 1-2%, every producer would receive a songwriting credit. the point is that feldmann was in a somewhat special position that made him able to get a bigger share from the songs than he would have deserved. i guess this special position was the fact that the label (or the band) invited him in the last minute, 3 months before they had to finish the album. (bands usually ask someone to be their producer a year before the record has to be done.) when you are asked to do an urgent job, you have the chance to ask some extra money/credit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Value Man Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 The truth, which has been stated, is that no one really knows how much Feldman contributed to the album. But when you examine the FACTS of the situation, it would appear, quite a bit IMO. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghent Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 Honestly Oliver, have you heard the album more than once or twice? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyCuomo Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 12 minutes ago, Ghent said: Honestly Oliver, have you heard the album more than once or twice? I still can't get over that he loved it a few days ago and now he's holier than us because he doesn't like it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghent Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 Yeah...it's not passing the smell test. enjoys the album, three days later learns that the producer was a co-writer...returns to boards calling everyone who likes the album fanboy idiots.. I mean at least the other haters decided they didn't like the album before they even heard it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxelder Posted July 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 1 minute ago, Ghent said: I mean at least the other haters decided they didn't like the album before they even heard it! i think you seem to think that anyone that dislikes the album hasn't listened to it enough or decided they would hate it beforehand. i was optimistic, have listened to it countless times, enjoy it, but find it lacking/almost bad. plenty of other posters have also offered well thought-out reasons as to why they don't like it. the only thing we seem to be getting from you is "it's great!! *holds hands over ears* LA LA LA LA LA" 9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyCuomo Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 27 minutes ago, Olidamus said: The truth, which has been stated, is that no one really knows how much Feldman contributed to the album. But when you examine the FACTS of the situation, it would appear, quite a bit IMO. Spot on. Then you lose me with your FACTS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghent Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 Love me some California!! Blink is back! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blink182life-4life Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 1 minute ago, boxelder said: i think you seem to think that anyone that dislikes the album hasn't listened to it enough or decided they would hate it beforehand. i was optimistic, have listened to it countless times, enjoy it, but find it lacking/almost bad. plenty of other posters have also offered well thought-out reasons as to why they don't like it. the only thing we seem to be getting from you is "it's great!! *holds hands over ears* LA LA LA LA LA" What's really amusing is that he and others decided they would like this no matter what a long time ago. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Watcher Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 9 minutes ago, Blink182life-4life said: What's really amusing is that he and others decided they would like this no matter what a long time ago. Yeah, when we first heard it and realized we liked it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boxelder Posted July 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 14 minutes ago, Blink182life-4life said: What's really amusing is that he and others decided they would like this no matter what a long time ago. i'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt on this one, that if it were over-the-top poppy they'd recoil a bit. i just wish they would understand where we're coming from instead of being so hostile towards people with more negative opinions 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Value Man Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 59 minutes ago, Ghent said: Honestly Oliver, have you heard the album more than once or twice? What the fuck? I have about 80% of the songs lyrics memorized at this point, even sober unfortunately..... so i dont even know what you are talking about. I really have tried to force myself to like it, when my mind says "hit the skip button" i tell myself not too and i dont hate it, i like some of it, but its likely one of their worst imo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Value Man Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 45 minutes ago, Ghent said: Yeah...it's not passing the smell test. enjoys the album, three days later learns that the producer was a co-writer...returns to boards calling everyone who likes the album fanboy idiots.. I mean at least the other haters decided they didn't like the album before they even heard it! i do like some of it, but it is their weakest imo, and a lot of the dislike is that it is so poppy and has no edge at all. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Value Man Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 41 minutes ago, EveryonebutOliveriswrong said: Spot on. Then you lose me with your FACTS fact#1: they added tons of whoas and lalalas, and EQd voices, pop sounds not present on previous albums. Who do YOU think decided that? people who have no history of such things, or a guy who writes for boy bands? think about that one 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blink182life-4life Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 32 minutes ago, boxelder said: i'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt on this one, that if it were over-the-top poppy they'd recoil a bit. i just wish they would understand where we're coming from instead of being so hostile towards people with more negative opinions The over the top defensiveness that comes off makes me feel like no matter what they'd love this record. Truth be told quite a few tracks have been played over and over again ever since the leak. But there's some that I just hate and skip. I try and keep my opinions fair instead of blind admiration 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zoltan Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 19 minutes ago, Olidamus said: fact#1: they added tons of whoas and lalalas, and EQd voices, pop sounds not present on previous albums. Who do YOU think decided that? people who have no history of such things, or a guy who writes for boy bands? think about that one i'm glad you moved from "feldmann wrote the songs" to "feldmann suggested to add whoas and made the sound polished". it's probably true, so it's more acceptable criticism. i doubt it has anything to do with feldmann's boyband history anyway. i still think he was asked by the label to make an album with the blink guys that would be the 2016 equivalent of enema of the state. (jerry finn worked 1999's pop into blink's sound; john feldmann tried to add something from 2016. for a blink fan the results sound a bit too sugarcoated, but for an average listener, it sounds like something from this era of pop music. plus guitars, drums, bass. and obviously neither mark, nor matt sound like a fucking popstar, their vocals can be polished to death, and they are still punk-rock voices.) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Value Man Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 32 minutes ago, Zoltan said: i'm glad you moved from "feldmann wrote the songs" to "feldmann suggested to add whoas and made the sound polished". it's probably true, so it's more acceptable criticism. i doubt it has anything to do with feldmann's boyband history anyway. i still think he was asked by the label to make an album with the blink guys that would be the 2016 equivalent of enema of the state. (jerry finn worked 1999's pop into blink's sound; john feldmann tried to add something from 2016. for a blink fan the results sound a bit too sugarcoated, but for an average listener, it sounds like something from this era of pop music. plus guitars, drums, bass. and obviously neither mark, nor matt sound like a fucking popstar, their vocals can be polished to death, and they are still punk-rock voices.) I never said Feldman wrote the entire thing. I also said it had Blink moments. But still, Feldman helped write it, and again, it is my opinion that his help was mostly a negative, and he turned what could have been an alternative album like Untitled, or a more pop punk/Plus 44 album, into a polished pop album. If he was going for Enema, he failed badly, this is not a bit like Enema. You could play the first 30 seconds of Dumpweed and just hear that and know California and Enema are on 2 different planets. I don't think Feldman was going for Enema, I think he was going for bubblegum pop with a touch of Blink 182 that would SELL. With that he succeded, the songs are cathcy, they get stuck in the mind, but some aren't all that good, they are annoying catchy almost. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyCuomo Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 1 hour ago, Olidamus said: fact#1: they added tons of whoas and lalalas, and EQd voices, pop sounds not present on previous albums. Who do YOU think decided that? people who have no history of such things, or a guy who writes for boy bands? think about that one And on Untitled it was the first time they repeated the song titles over and over in the song - Feeling This, I Miss You, Down, Go. Must have been Jerry Finn who decided on that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b00bies Posted July 16, 2016 Report Share Posted July 16, 2016 18 minutes ago, EveryonebutOliveriswrong said: And on Untitled it was the first time they repeated the song titles over and over in the song - Feeling This, I Miss You, Down, Go. Must have been Jerry Finn who decided on that. what in the fuck ^^ that is the most retarded crap i've ever read. and any of these songs you've listed blows california out of water easily. yeah, you keep believe that their next record will change somehow. mark would love to write albums like california forever. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.