Cheerios4u98 Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 Nah, a bad new album wouldn't ruin the greatness that came before. It's worth a shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 It's worth a shot, no doubt about it, but please, no multi-producer bullshit and no Feldmann glossy shit. If the're gonna release a new +44 album made a la California-Nine modus operandi, and saying that 'this is where we're at now', they better let the thing rest. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neal Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 I dont see how a new +44 album would be any different than what blink is doing now. +44 was what mark and travis came up with musically in 2007. Nine is what mark and travis are coming up with in 2019. I dont see how adding 2 live guitarists to the "line-up" changes anything? They definately should start playing those songs again live though. By far the best material mark and travis did without tom 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vic vinegar Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 5 hours ago, Cheerios4u98 said: Nah, a bad new album wouldn't ruin the greatness that came before. It's worth a shot. Maybe if they replaced Shane with someone like Matt Skiba a new album might work. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 3 hours ago, Neal said: I dont see how a new +44 album would be any different than what blink is doing now. +44 was what mark and travis came up with musically in 2007. Nine is what mark and travis are coming up with in 2019. I dont see how adding 2 live guitarists to the "line-up" changes anything? They definately should start playing those songs again live though. By far the best material mark and travis did without tom This, it wouldn't sound any different. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Backing Track Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 4 hours ago, Neal said: I dont see how a new +44 album would be any different than what blink is doing now. +44 was what mark and travis came up with musically in 2007. Nine is what mark and travis are coming up with in 2019. I dont see how adding 2 live guitarists to the "line-up" changes anything? They definately should start playing those songs again live though. By far the best material mark and travis did without tom You never know, they won't have the expectations of whatever the hell they think blink should be and can just be genuine. Which is one of the biggest things holding them back. Mark's features have seemed way more natural and better than Cali/Nine. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 What could be a brutal thing to do is a tour. Just play the damn whole +44 record live again. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Backing Track Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 1 hour ago, Ghost said: What could be a brutal thing to do is a tour. Just play the damn whole +44 record live again. Omg I'd jizz. Of course Mark would find a way to slide in Rock Show and First Date though. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheerios4u98 Posted December 16, 2019 Report Share Posted December 16, 2019 4 hours ago, NJanSaid said: Omg I'd jizz. Of course Mark would find a way to slide in Rock Show and First Date though. That would be fine, +44 doesn’t have that many songs of their own. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hit me up Jans ex Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 12 hours ago, Neal said: I dont see how a new +44 album would be any different than what blink is doing now. +44 was what mark and travis came up with musically in 2007. Nine is what mark and travis are coming up with in 2019. I dont see how adding 2 live guitarists to the "line-up" changes anything? They definately should start playing those songs again live though. By far the best material mark and travis did without tom THIS. Thanks for saving me the effort and saying exactly what I wanted to say. I feel the +44 album is EXTREMELY overrated on this board anyways. What did Craig and Shane contribute to +44 anyways? Certainly not more than what Skiba contributes to the current blink lineup. People getting their panties in a bunch because Mark politely said “never say never.” 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Backing Track Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 17 minutes ago, Diddy Faplord said: THIS. Thanks for saving me the effort and saying exactly what I wanted to say. I feel the +44 album is EXTREMELY overrated on this board anyways. What did Craig and Shane contribute to +44 anyways? Certainly not more than what Skiba contributes to the current blink lineup. People getting their panties in a bunch because Mark politely said “never say never.” 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheerios4u98 Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 More +44 would be cool because that whole album felt more genuine than anything blink has done since then. It also has a different tone and feel than blink, despite being similar. I think Mark knows that +44 and blink are different and if he ever returned to +44 I don’t think it would be the same as current blink. All I really want though is a tour. I’d obviously be excited for new music, but what I really want and would love more than anything is to experience that album live. Even if they just randomly put a single +44 song into a blink set one day, that would make me super happy. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosferatu Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 29 minutes ago, Diddy Faplord said: THIS. Thanks for saving me the effort and saying exactly what I wanted to say. I feel the +44 album is EXTREMELY overrated on this board anyways. What did Craig and Shane contribute to +44 anyways? Certainly not more than what Skiba contributes to the current blink lineup. People getting their panties in a bunch because Mark politely said “never say never.” Shane and Craig definitely contributed when it came to guitars. +44 was originally meant to be an electronic project with just 3 musicians, one of them being that Carol. As soon as Shane and Craig joined the band, they turned into a more guitar driven band, which was one of the reasons Carol left. I'd say they contributed just as much as Skiba did with blink bar a couple of Skiba oriented songs like NHTSO and Black Rain. Only difference is Skiba also wrote some lyrics and had lead vocal duties in some tracks. Whereas +44 actually has some cool riffs and guitar licks that Shane and Craig had a part in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Champ182 Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 15 hours ago, Cheerios4u98 said: Even if they just randomly put a single +44 song into a blink set one day, that would make me super happy. They should 1000% be doing this regularly. Throw WYHSB and Baby Come On into every set and have them become live staples, what's the drawback? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neal Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 I'd pay a good amount of money to see +44 songs played live in a venue near me. "Blink" played here last year and i didnt bother going 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thongrider Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 3 minutes ago, Champ182 said: They should 1000% be doing this regularly. Throw WYHSB and Baby Come On into every set and have them become live staples, what's the drawback? They won't even play blink deep cuts. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thongrider Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 I still like to imagine that they started a new band after Tom with Skiba and Feldmann on guitar and Mark produced their album and they played both blink and,+44 along with the new stuff. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neal Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 I know i said it a lot , but its been a while. If blink would've quit and everybody just started doing what they are interested in in 2015 we'd probably have fewer, but much better songs out by this point 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzz Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 7 minutes ago, Champ182 said: Throw WYHSB and Baby Come On into every set and have them become live staples, what's the drawback? Could see WYHSB or Lycanthrope being thrown in there and people would just assume it was new or deep blink stuff. But yeah, they can hardly fit new blink/classic deep cuts in...so just no way they would do that. I do wish when they do these acoustic Matt + Mark shows they would branch out a bit and add a +44 or Alk3 song in there for fun. I'll take that over Misfits/Post Malone covers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
radioactive tomdog Posted December 17, 2019 Report Share Posted December 17, 2019 15 hours ago, Nosferatu said: Shane and Craig definitely contributed when it came to guitars. +44 was originally meant to be an electronic project with just 3 musicians, one of them being that Carol. As soon as Shane and Craig joined the band, they turned into a more guitar driven band, which was one of the reasons Carol left. +44 actually has some cool riffs and guitar licks that Shane and Craig had a part in. i'm bored right now and i'd like to say i think this is all wrong. +44 was never meant to be an electronic project. when the band was announced, mark stated in an interview that everything was very electronic solely because they were writing in his living room at the time with an electronic drum kit and a drum machine. it was prior to him and travis buying their own recording studio and having the ability to record with live drums. those demos are readily available and by no means were they "electronic" by genre definition. they are essentially the same songs and they predate shane and craig joining the band. we don't know what happened with carol. mark claims she "wanted to start a family." as far as i know, there isn't any information available that suggests otherwise. shane and craig's involvement with the writing and recording process is a mystery. it's more likely that they weren't really involved at all, like david kennedy and the bassist in box car racer. the style of guitar playing is pretty consistent across the entire record and similar to both the early demos and mark's songs on neighborhoods. for this reason, i think it was all him. interviews with mark suggest craig joined when the album was practically finished and shane was allegedly "around" during the recording process. mark was regularly doing his podcast during the recording of the album and from what i remember, he really talked about being there alone with chris holmes every day. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.