Scott. Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 4 minutes ago, theedge00 said: If it's similar to My First Punk Song, then it's fine I guess?? That’s shit too. The only one I skip off that album. It’s a proper try hard cringfest 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 My First Punk Song is technically a joke song, is longer than 49 seconds, and is fucking killer. I don't see it being similar if they don't have 'joke songs' on this record, but MFPS was also not released as a single either. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elisa Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 I love short songs but I don't want blink to be random and make a disjointed album where pop stuffs like BIOMY are mixed with short "punk rock" songs. Scott isn't wrong when he says they have no idea about what they're doing. And IF Generational Divide is just 49 seconds and it's good, then they'll have wasted a good song. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nosferatu Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 49 seconds is a disgrace. Usually I wouldn't mind but they've released a lot of trash in the past 3 years. Worst thing is that it sounds good. Had the same opinion of Brohemian Rhapsody. That was the most blink sounding song out of the California songs and they wasted it on a short ass joke song. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samukaskin Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 Anyone was invited to that secret show today? We're probably gonna know if GD is 49 seconds before the official release if they play this song tonight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jigsaw Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 Think the video might actually be for Blame It On My Youth, to try and push it further with sales? Seriously can't see GD being a 49 second song. Sounds encouraging but I just refuse to get my hopes up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas D. Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 Did they really tease 11 seconds of a 49 second song? Hope it's not true because it sounds good. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Value Man Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 9 hours ago, Russel Coight said: Pretty sure old mate also claimed he could rewrite dammit into a pop hit in 10 minutes. Still waiting on that one. Um, nope. I said I could produce a piece of shit like BIOMY via rewrite. It wouldn't actually be a good song. It would just fool idiots into thinking it was good and using Blink's name recognition, that would put a turd a #16 on the charts. But this is how most music is these days. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Value Man Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 ANd BIOMY is the biggest pile of shit they have ever written, outside of some obscure song on flyswatter when they were just starting out. As for this "song"...... if its 49 seconds. Its not a real song. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Low Value Boy Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 2 hours ago, 2point5 said: I don’t understand why they’d record a video for such a short song. Probably just a promo thing, similar to Brohemian Rhapsody one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Value Man Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 I think Dan is right. Blink has gotten flamed hard for the Lil Wayne WMAA video and in some respects the BIOMY song. They are WELL aware that none of this is going well for them. This is a cheap way for them to see "look we still write punk songs. We are still cool" in some little ditty promo video That is all it is. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerpipe Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 I think I’m only one not pissed off that this song is only 49 secs long haha. I guess my expectations are super low these days. BIOMY was like 3 and a half minutes of a homeless guy having diarrhea in an alley at night SO even though GD is only 49 seconds it HAS to be better. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thongrider Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 I like every song on Flyswatter more than BIOMY 4 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 5 minutes ago, thongrider said: I like every song on Flyswatter more than BIOMY Same tbh 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kay Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 3 minutes ago, Ry-Bread said: Song is out, and it's 49 seconds forrealz... where is it out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bucko Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 I like it but just wish it was longer. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hit me up Jans ex Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 1 hour ago, Nosferatu said: 49 seconds is a disgrace. Usually I wouldn't mind but they've released a lot of trash in the past 3 years. Worst thing is that it sounds good. Had the same opinion of Brohemian Rhapsody. That was the most blink sounding song out of the California songs and they wasted it on a short ass joke song. THIS Bohemian Rhapsody could have been sweet, and they just threw it away. This would be retarded to release a video and single for 49 seconds. What's the point? That being said, where did this rumor about it being 49 seconds start from? Has it been confirmed? Could just be an ass hat starting rumors, so let's not get our panties in a bunch just yet... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bucko Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 Just now, Diddy Faplord said: THIS Bohemian Rhapsody could have been sweet, and they just threw it away. This would be retarded to release a video and single for 49 seconds. What's the point? That being said, where did this rumor about it being 49 seconds start from? Has it been confirmed? Could just be an ass hat starting rumors, so let's not get our panties in a bunch just yet... Check reddit 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzz Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 It is def a quick banger, but MAJOR blue balls on this one due to length. Kicks ass though. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas D. Posted June 20, 2019 Report Share Posted June 20, 2019 It sounds good yet it feels unfinished and a waste of time. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.