Speedo Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 28 minutes ago, JarJarBlinks said: If Tom was on California and Feldmann wasn't producing or known of no one would be complaining about the production. It's just another way for people to pile dirt onto that era of the band. (yes this is a hypothetical) I gotta disagree with this a bit, I’m not saying the production on it was bad at all. It just doesn’t fit my taste. It’s got a style of production that comes off plasticky to me. It’s why I don’t care for a lot of the modern pop punk bands, I feel like they’d all be improved if the edges were roughed up a bit. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radioactive Ghent Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 3 minutes ago, Its a me, Speedo said: I gotta disagree with this a bit, I’m not saying the production on it was bad at all. It just doesn’t fit my taste. It’s got a style of production that comes off plasticky to me. It’s why I don’t care for a lot of the modern pop punk bands, I feel like they’d all be improved if the edges were roughed up a bit. It sounds a lot like TOYPAJ to me, which is my favorite sounding blink album. It's not quite the same, but as close as they've come to that sound since imo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radioactive Ghent Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 11 minutes ago, Fap said: Once again, nobody here said they could produce the music better. Gonna have to start calling you Oliver now. Whoa did I just get compared to a legend? Appreciate it Fap! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neal Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 I‘m on ghent with this. Just because i dont like the way its produced doesn’t mean there is something wrong with it or its produced badly. i wouldnt try to discuss this with fap though.he can‘t wrap his head around the concept of personal preference vs objective quality 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radioactive Ghent Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Neal said: I‘m on ghent with this. Shocking scenes! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thongrider Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Neal said: I‘m on ghent with this. Just because i dont like the way its produced doesn’t mean there is something wrong with it or its produced badly. i wouldnt try to discuss this with fap though.he can‘t wrap his head around the concept of personal preference vs objective quality This is stuff people who prefer the production of toypaj to Cheshire Cat say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worst poster here Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 6 minutes ago, Ghent said: It sounds a lot like TOYPAJ to me, which is my favorite sounding blink album. It's not quite the same, but as close as they've come to that sound since imo Nah, EISF and PLG were closer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Speedo Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Ghent said: It sounds a lot like TOYPAJ to me, which is my favorite sounding blink album. It's not quite the same, but as close as they've come to that sound since imo They’re both polished, I’ll give you that but TOYPAJ has that graininess and saturation from the tape and I like those things. It’s less crisp and sharp. Does it make a difference on a grand scale? No. Would the average radio listener ever notice? Absolutely not. That what I’m saying though, it’s just personal preference and it’s something I notice. It didn’t kill the albums for me or anything, just something I’d prefer be different than how it was. I promise, if the record comes out and it’s an over polished, plastic mess, I’ll be the first to bitch. Tom or not. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russel Coight Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 6 minutes ago, Neal said: I‘m on ghent with this. Just because i dont like the way its produced doesn’t mean there is something wrong with it or its produced badly. i wouldnt try to discuss this with fap though.he can‘t wrap his head around the concept of personal preference vs objective quality Yep! This is exactly what I tried saying earlier. It’s not bad production just cause you don’t like the style. Some people really struggle with this. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worst poster here Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 2 minutes ago, Coightstanza said: Yep! This is exactly what I tried saying earlier. It’s not bad production just cause you don’t like the style. Some people really struggle with this. I think it’s a superficial point that does not really impact the disagreement though. I agree with you, but art is subjective, so if you say “I don’t like the method they did to achieve this because X”, it’s because it’s your personal preference as you don’t like the style. Like, you can apply your approach to anyone criticizing any form of art which really has the effect of trying to stifle discussion imo. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russel Coight Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 52 minutes ago, Worst poster here said: I think one of the main issues is that Blink’s production from California onwards (although Nine was a huge improvement) has been streamlined a lot based on moving towards digital programs. It’s not unique to Blink as it seems like most artists do this now. It just seems a bit lazier and less heart and soul go into the songs, like compare California to any Finn produced song where he spent hours reorganizing mics around Travis’ drum kit. That obsessive devotion is very noticeable, especially when you listen to a song hundreds of times. I 100% prefer Finns production to anything we’ve gotten since. No contest. Doesn’t mean what we have gotten is bad though. Just a different style. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radioactive Ghent Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 It's a completely different story to say "I don't like the production because it's too glossy. I prefer a grittier more raw sound even on the poppier songs." I disagree personally, but that's a matter of taste. It's the people who act like it's objectively poorly done that annoy me. That's a ridiculous claim 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Fap Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 12 minutes ago, Neal said: I‘m on ghent with this. Just because i dont like the way its produced doesn’t mean there is something wrong with it or its produced badly. i wouldnt try to discuss this with fap though.he can‘t wrap his head around the concept of personal preference vs objective quality You’re so pathetic. I like that I butthurt you so bad somewhere down the line that you always have to mention me in a negative light. You’re with Ghent on this, but he’s the one that is saying anyone who dares object to his personal preference is wrong. Way to go full retard Neal! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radioactive Ghent Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 Just now, Fap said: You’re with Ghent on this, but he’s the one that is saying anyone who dares object to his personal preference is wrong. Way to go full retard Neal! That's not what I'm saying dingleberry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neal Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Fap said: You’re so pathetic. I like that I butthurt you so bad somewhere down the line that you always have to mention me in a negative light. You’re with Ghent on this, but he’s the one that is saying anyone who dares object to his personal preference is wrong. Way to go full retard Neal! Dont forget to upvote your own posts with your second account / crab me twice 😘 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Fap Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 1 minute ago, Ghent said: That's not what I'm saying dingleberry Yea ok, go ahead and change your stance now bud, all good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worst poster here Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 4 minutes ago, Ghent said: It's a completely different story to say "I don't like the production because it's too glossy. I prefer a grittier more raw sound even on the poppier songs." I disagree personally, but that's a matter of taste. It's the people who act like it's objectively poorly done that annoy me. That's a ridiculous claim I don’t know anything about creating CGI graphics but I can say with certainty when something looks like dog shit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Fap Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 Just now, Neal said: Dont forget to upvote your own posts with your second account / crab me twice 😘 You should try and get laid for once, might help you out a bit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radioactive Ghent Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 Mark, Tom, and Travis must have sat down and listened to the final mix/master of Edging and were like "yeah that sounds like total shit but let's release it anyway boys!" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worst poster here Posted February 21 Report Share Posted February 21 So I have no experience or expertise in the film industry or the processes behind it. I guess I am precluded from objectively stating that these practical effects are really shitty I just love dunking on illogical, shitty arguments lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.