Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
Posted

I never care about anniversary editions & remasters but I look forward to listening to the 25th anniversary version of Warning tomorrow. Mostly for the demos.

  • Like 3
Posted

I've never listened to a remaster and been like 'wow, yeah, thanks so much for doing this subtle slight improvement to the sound design on the bass'.  I feel like if it was a masterpiece (what usually gets remastered) for the time, what's the point of tinkering with the original cut that became famous to begin with? 

That being said, I do like demos.  And I wouldn't hate a non-canon/unofficial Dude Ranch remaster just to hear it.

  • Like 1
  • Clown 1
Posted

the problem I have with Warning (it's a fantastic album) is that it was over-produced. the remastering might be better but it needed to recorded a little bit more raggedy to get the rootsy feel they have going on. 

  • Love 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, _Kyle_ said:

the problem I have with Warning (it's a fantastic album) is that it was over-produced. the remastering might be better but it needed to recorded a little bit more raggedy to get the rootsy feel they have going on. 

Definitely needed less polish … the remaster is sort of more of the same. Still one of my favorite greenday albums.

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...