Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Zoltan last won the day on June 12 2016

Zoltan had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1155 Excellent

About Zoltan

  • Rank
    Mark Tom and Travis Show

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Budapest, Hungary

Display Name History

  1. Blink Vegas Residency

    i'm against backing tracks for most songs, but the acoustic ones are empty without them. california sounds great on the album, but this live acoustic version is too thin. the idea of back and forth vocals in the party song is good. it would have been a trainwreck if mark tried to sing it alone.
  2. Blink on Kimmel

    the problem with blink's live shows is the strict tempo. without backing tracks and the unnecessary stage production, the songs would sound better. i can understand the point that they want the songs to sound as the songs were written, but i prefer if the show goes a bit wilder. that's the spirit of all live performances. they don't have to be faster, they just need to be less "perfect". i really like atst when my friends play that song live with only 3 instruments (guitar, bass, drums), but blink's "perfect" version with the loud backing track is horrible for me.
  3. Blink-182 Signature Study

    ask the seller about those stains
  4. 2018 "New Album News" Thread

    because he lost the war.
  5. Blink KROQ Weenie Roast Stream

    here it is. although it's worth watching only because of just like heaven. the rest of the set is pretty boring.
  6. Blink KROQ Weenie Roast Stream

    just like heaven was a nice surprise. sounded great.
  7. The blink 182 general discussion topic

    i think the band regretted how they acted in 2003. the fans believed that they saw a normal writing process while in fact bands usually don't write like that. blink always had mark songs and tom songs, written separately. even the bigger part of the untitled album was written this way (only a few songs were written together), but we got the illusion that the normal process is members throwing in ideas in the writing process. (well, normally one of the songwriters write the song, then the other members and producers give their inputs, and the song is done.) the real problem with neighborhoods wasn't that they wrote their parts separately. it would have been pretty normal. the problem was the lack of communication, the process missed the part where they re-think eachother's ideas or at least add something to the other writer's songs. (tom didn't care about mark's songs, and mark got complete songs from tom without a real chance to modify them.)
  8. The blink 182 general discussion topic

    a company that makes ugly square headed action figures. someone made custom blink figures with them: https://nlbdesigns.wordpress.com/2017/06/08/blink-182/
  9. AVA General Discussion

    the first time i heard young london i thought the similar riff and the roars and drum beats in the intro are intentional homage to ac/dc. i can't stand ac/dc, but i liked this ava song, so it's obviously not a straight copy.
  10. Golden Shower in the Golden State riff

    your dad can suck my cock if he can come and play your mom can touch my dick every single fucking day ride's gettin' rough so i know i better buckle p-u-n-x tattooed on my knuckles
  11. Golden Shower in the Golden State riff

    it's million bucks vs golden showers...
  12. Golden Shower in the Golden State riff

    you don't think they are similar? they are almost identical. the original: e|---------------------------------| B|---------------------------------| G|-------4-4-4-------3-3-3-1-1-----| D|-1-1-1-------4-4-4-----------2-2-| A|---------------------------------| E|---------------------------------| tom's version: e|---------------------------------| B|---------------------------------| G|-------4-4-4---------------------| D|-1-1-1-------1-1-1-2-2-2-4-4-2-2-| A|---------------------------------| E|---------------------------------|
  13. the above video is a good evidence for future lawsuits. i have said before that there's no chance of suing tom for the instant devaluation of the shares, because it is in the contract, so no one was scammed. but: it is still scamming if he publicly talks about these shares as a good investment (contradicting with what the contract says). so the problem is not in the paperwork, it's in the false advertising.
  14. they were not dumb. i bet 2 million out of that 2.5 million is tom's (imaginary) money. since a share with $5 face value is only $0.0002 after it's bought, the net worth of $2,000,000 investment is only 80 usd.