Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


M!ke last won the day on June 22 2017

M!ke had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3289 Excellent

About M!ke

  • Rank

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Interests
    Wait... When are the pancakes coming in the mail?

Recent Profile Visitors

1837 profile views

Display Name History

  1. Just listened to the album in the first time all the way few in a few weeks, and wow, I'm really impressed with how solid this album is at the end of the day. It isn't their best album, but fuck, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say I like it more than I do Neighborhoods, and I'm a man that enjoys his Neighborhoods, even if it does have a few glaring weak points.
  2. I've only ever seen them live once, right before the Underclass Hero album was released, but they were fantastic. Seems like their live show has always been pretty solid, even when they were without Brownsound.
  3. New song isn't bad. But I feel like it lacks the kind of hook it should have, the chorus is a bit weak, verses are great though.
  4. Yeah, unimpressed with the representation. But seeing the fighter in action does seem like a fighter I'll excel at. Dedede is my main, and this one seems like it scratches a lot of the same itches in how he fights compared to Dedede. And at least we know there are at least 6 more DLC fighters to come. That's exciting. That video actually said 6 more for season 2. Guess it's actually mirroring season 1, while Piranha Plant wasn't part of the pass, he does add up to 6 DLC fighters for the first season when you count him.
  5. I'm a sucker for Smash Bros, and a new fighter gets revealed tomorrow (will probably go live tomorrow too by the sounds of it). I'm really curious who it will be, it's always exciting to find out who the next iconic video game character is that will get added, and all this DLC have been 3rd parties, so the sky seems to be the limit. I'm hoping for Crash Bandicoot, Lara Croft, or Doomslayer.
  6. Something tells me that when it comes to TLJ you would have pointed to the critics score and not the fans score as if that proves a similar point. The only thing we can really gather from aggregate reviews is that everyone is different. People will like what they like and dislike what they dislike. Conversely, does it mean anything to you that the audience score on Metacritic is only a 5.1? Of course not, if you like it, awesome, if people don't like it, then they have their reasons to.
  7. Wow, that's so fucking lame. Makes me ashamed to have ever considered myself a fan of this band.
  8. Is it true though that it feels like 2 films worth of material crammed into 1? I can see how that wont sit well with some moviegoers.
  9. If no one is going to believe you as it is, then I doubt you'd have to worry about the story getting picked up. And even if it is, what's the headline? 'Divorced musician may have cheated on ex-wife'? Someone hold the presses, such a story is unfathomable.
  10. I don't doubt you have a full story, but why do you think you have some sort of brocode agreement with Tom to uphold here? Do you think Tom even remembers you? You think he'd feel betrayed if you told your full story? I doubt your story comes with any tangible proof (ie: photos or video) as it is, so why would he care if someone on a blink fan site is telling a story where they believe they witnessed proof that he cheated? Why would he even care now all the more now that he is divorced from Jen? What are you trying to protect at this point?
  11. Well I'll agree to that, none of us know for sure, but my point is simply that, 'almost 2 years' is much too vague to draw any definitive conclusions on for exactly how long they've truly been dating if you ask me. Again, I don't dismiss that he may well have cheated, but this statement is far from the smoking gun to prove as much.
  12. You have an odd world view Oli. The idea that people have to adhere to how you tell time is a bit silly. I would absolutely understand someone saying they've been with someone for almost 2 years when it's only been a bit more than a year and a half.
  13. Why do you say that? I say that all the time when people ask how long I've worked at my job, it's been almost 3 years, when in reality it's been about 2 years and 9 months at this point. You might not think of things such way, but others absolutely do.
  14. Where are you getting that the move happened in a couple of weeks? Do we know how long he had marital issues definitively? Do we know when he hooked up with his new chick definitively? He said almost 2 years, and the separation seems to have started 2 years and a month ago. But again, 'almost 2 years' could mean 1 year and 8 months for all we know. I don't dismiss the possibility that he cheated, but I also don't see any solid proof that he did with what we do know either.
  15. They claim they watched a bootleg, I just checked my fave bootleg site, and it is indeed available in a cam recording. It's possible they did watch it this way. Why anyone would sit through a cam recording though has always been beyond me; no matter how good a film is, that's a miserable way to watch any movie.
  • Create New...