Jump to content
 

Patient #48273

Moderators
  • Posts

    16656
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    182

Patient #48273 last won the day on April 19

Patient #48273 had the most liked content!

Reputation

14238 Excellent

2 Followers

About Patient #48273

  • Birthday 09/27/1989

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    Canada
  • Real Name
    Laura

Title

  • Member Title
    High Value Homo

Recent Profile Visitors

5949 profile views

Single Status Update

See all updates by Patient #48273

  1. Jan is right. Fish shouldn't be flushed, even after they die. Either let it die on its own or google ethical ways to euthanize a fish.

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. Ghent

      Ghent

      I can see how it might be bad for a personal septic system, but most people aren't on septic systems. But I don't see how a city sewer could be affected by a tiny blob of organic material

    3. Patient #48273

      Patient #48273

      I'm not convinced most lay people (myself included) can accurately verify whether a fish is dying or just sick. There will inevitably be some mistakes, leading to live fish being released. And even if you wait until they're dead, the dead fish are probably diseased and if they're eaten by native fish, it could cause issues. Yes, sewage is also bad for them, but doesn't carry species-specific viruses, etc.

      And it's not going to be a big deal if one person occasionally flushes a sick fish, but if lots of people do it, it can cause serious issues.

    4. Ghent

      Ghent

      So you are opposed on an ethical level more than a practical level.

      That's fair.

      A fish doesn't reach that level of moral consideration for me though. I'd feel worse about squashing certain types of insects than I would flushing a half dead fish. Fish barely have a brain

×
×
  • Create New...