Jump to content
 

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 11/11/2024 at 5:51 AM, Scott. said:

We know the Grammys are shit but if those Green Day gimps are there then blink deserve to be, but like I said blink will never get the recognition they deserve.

Bro you listen to whiny emo poppy bands like neck deep and make fun of Green Day? 😂

make it make sense 

Posted
24 minutes ago, Harry Butker said:

How is it more impactful than Saviors? Just because YOU prefer it? It’s more impactful to YOU, not society as a whole. 

No I'm speaking for society.  I liked Saviors, but no one actually gave a shit about it.  Every single person and their grandmother was excited for blink reuniting back with Tom.  

  • Like 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Elite Takes - this is jan said:

No I'm speaking for society.  I liked Saviors, but no one actually gave a shit about it.  Every single person and their grandmother was excited for blink reuniting back with Tom.  

That’s because you live in a blink-182 echo chamber. All the Green Day hate here just shows how insecure and envious y’all are. 

  • Clown 1
Posted
12 minutes ago, Harry Butker said:

That’s because you live in a blink-182 echo chamber. All the Green Day hate here just shows how insecure and envious y’all are. 

What's your hard on with Green Day?  They haven't done anything good since American Idiot.  Mid-band since then.  Very good prime tho!  Loved Dookie-AI.  Washed as fuck though, that's non debatable and not open for interpretation. 

  • Like 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Elite Takes - this is jan said:

What's your hard on with Green Day?  They haven't done anything good since American Idiot.  Mid-band since then.  Very good prime tho!  Loved Dookie-AI.  Washed as fuck though, that's non debatable and not open for interpretation. 

I don’t have a hard on for Green Day. If you can’t see that your opinions on OMT being so much more grately touted than Saviors are completely biased then there is no having a fair discussion with you and I can’t help you. Just because you feel that way about Green Day doesn’t mean the rest of the world does. You live in a blink-182 echo chamber and that’s totally okay, but you should be able to admit when you’re being completely blind and biased. 

  • Pickle 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Harry Butker said:

I don’t have a hard on for Green Day. If you can’t see that your opinions on OMT being so much more grately touted than Saviors are completely biased then there is no having a fair discussion with you and I can’t help you. Just because you feel that way about Green Day doesn’t mean the rest of the world does. You live in a blink-182 echo chamber and that’s totally okay, but you should be able to admit when you’re being completely blind and biased. 

Dude, you're just wrong and obsessed with dying on this embarrassing over the hill band hill.  I'm pretty harsh on OMT and everything blink has done since Hoods.  Doesn't change the fact Green Day is extremely cringe and mediocre for an even longer time.  I actually liked Saviors, personally.   Better than Revolution Radio, Father of all, uno dos and whatever else other shit they've done.  Better than Cali/Nine will give you that. 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Elite Takes - this is jan said:

Dude, you're just wrong and obsessed with dying on this embarrassing over the hill band hill.  I'm pretty harsh on OMT and everything blink has done since Hoods.  Doesn't change the fact Green Day is extremely cringe and mediocre for an even longer time.  I actually liked Saviors, personally.   Better than Revolution Radio, Father of all, uno dos and whatever else other shit they've done.  Better than Cali/Nine will give you that. 

No, I’m not wrong. And I’m not even going to read the rest of your quote. You’re the equivilant of a “Homer” for sports teams. A Homer is defined as a fan, game official, media commentator, reporter, etc. who is biased in favor of their home team. That’s you to a tee. Period, end of discussion. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Harry Butker said:

No, I’m not wrong. And I’m not even going to read the rest of your quote. You’re the equivilant of a “Homer” for sports teams. A Homer is defined as a fan, game official, media commentator, reporter, etc. who is biased in favor of their home team. That’s you to a tee. Period, end of discussion. 

You're incorrect.  

Posted
3 minutes ago, Elite Takes - this is jan said:

Your like the See You of posters.

*you’re 

Sorry but I can’t trust the opinion of someone who doesn’t understand the difference between a contraction and a possessive adjective. 

Posted
27 minutes ago, Harry Butker said:

*you’re 

Sorry but I can’t trust the opinion of someone who doesn’t understand the difference between a contraction and a possessive adjective. 

You’re the one fucking hyping Saviors like it’s Abbey Road.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Elite Takes - this is jan said:

You’re the one fucking hyping Saviors like it’s Abbey Road.

Admitting that Saviors had a bigger impact on society than OMT is hardly calling it Abbey Road. The only reason you’re making that correlation is because you’re treating OMT like it’s Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. 

  • Crab 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Harry Butker said:

Admitting that Saviors had a bigger impact on society than OMT is hardly calling it Abbey Road. The only reason you’re making that correlation is because you’re treating OMT like it’s Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. 

It didn’t have a bigger impact, lmao.  Get out from under the rock you’ve been living under OMT was massive. EDGING was bigger than Saviors.  And I liked Saviors.  You just hate what’s popular like a diva.  

  • Clown 1
Posted
22 minutes ago, Elite Takes - this is jan said:

It didn’t have a bigger impact, lmao.  Get out from under the rock you’ve been living under OMT was massive. EDGING was bigger than Saviors.  And I liked Saviors.  You just hate what’s popular like a diva.  

It was massive to blink fans, nobody else gives a fuck. Sorry but it’s true. And I am quite fond of OMT and listen to it a hell of a lot more than Saviors, I only know a couple songs from Saviors. OMT isn’t more popular than Saviors though, so your argument of me hating it is wrong and your argument saying I hate it because it’s popular is also wrong. 

Homer 

Posted

OMT and Saviors have nearly identical scores on Metacritic, but OMT has sold significantly better so far. Obviously there's a lot more to cultural impact than critical reception and sales, but let's be real, it's unlikely that either of these albums had a "big impact on society". But the data we have show that it's laughable to say that only those of us in a blink echo chamber would claim that OMT had a bigger impact.

  • Like 4
Posted
Just now, Patient #48273 said:

OMT and Saviors have nearly identical scores on Metacritic, but OMT has sold significantly better so far. Obviously there's a lot more to cultural impact than critical reception and sales, but let's be real, it's unlikely that either of these albums had a "big impact on society". But the data we have show that it's laughable to say that only those of us in a blink echo chamber would claim that OMT had a bigger impact.

I don’t think either of them had a big impact on Society. But I stand by the fact that Jan’s comment I originally responded to is incredibly biased. It’s so biased it’s laughable. And that’d be okay if he could admit his bias 

Posted

I don‘t think omt is grammy worthy. I‘ve yet to come across a non-blink fan speak fondly or even recognize the existence of that record. Same goes with the green day record though… the fontaines record deserves it imo

 

 

 

@Harry Butker i don‘t really know what‘s going on, but as someone who only comes back here from time to time, let me tell you that every time i come back your account turns more into a poor man‘s oliver. Not sure if that‘s what you‘re going for, just thought i‘d let you know since it‘s very evident when only logging in every couple weeks.

the world seems to turn more and more in to a hatefull and divided place. Do you really want to spend your time online as a contrarian, pissing people off? Can‘t remember the last time i read a geniune positive post from you. 
Food for thought

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Wow 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Harry Butker said:

I don’t think either of them had a big impact on Society. But I stand by the fact that Jan’s comment I originally responded to is incredibly biased. It’s so biased it’s laughable. And that’d be okay if he could admit his bias 

Green Day sucks dude, these are just the facts.

They came in hot and started things off but blink came in and did everything better, looked better, smelt better, better guitar.  Green Day’s been jealous ever since and tried to be like them just like everyone else.

We thank Green Day for starting things off for pop punk and getting some of the early awkward clunky stages out of the way and can respect them for that.  That’s as far as it goes.

  • Like 1
  • Clown 1
Posted
On 11/8/2024 at 7:41 PM, Scott. said:

Green Day are little woke cunts though aren’t they while Tom and Mark are on stage talking about sucking eachothers dicks. 

This is it. But never want them to change. When I'm old and decrepit I'm sure a dick joke will still make me laugh, as will Blink.

  • Clown 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...